Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janet Jacme

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If somebody wants to recreate it as a redirect to List of members of the AVN Hall of Fame, feel free. – Joe (talk) 15:39, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Janet Jacme (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO. The sources are not reliable enough for notability, and searching on Google does not give even a single result at all. Steve Quinn tried to draftify this, but the draftification was reverted by Malik Shabazz. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 05:58, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Babymissfortune 06:25, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Babymissfortune 06:26, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Babymissfortune 06:26, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please provide sources that show GNG is met and the AVN hall of fame is not an independent reliable source as its function is to promote the porn industry and its actors. Notablity is not inherited. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 07:49, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 22:18, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:43, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:44, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.