Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jane's Hotel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:56, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jane's Hotel[edit]

Issues with this video game: very poor grammar, may be an advertisement, unreferenced, and almost certainly not notable. I could not find any reliable refs for this article amid the hundreds of links to go play the shockwave version of the game. Millbrooky (talk) 17:13, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 17:39, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I see nothing notable about this game. I was thinking to merge and redirect to Realore Studios but while looking there, I find that Realore Studios itself seems to fail WP:N. There are a number of games that this studio has produced that have articles here and all appear to be the dime a dozen flash games that are produced by the thousands a year.--Pmedema (talk) 18:10, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Besides a very usable Gamezebo review there's nothing else coming out of google (had a look for sources for this one previously, as well as another go just now). Multiple reliable sources are needed to establish notability and provide materials to build an article with, one won't do. A rash of Realore games were created a few days ago and I'm struggling to find acceptable sources for any of them besides Gamezebo who review a lot of casual games. Someone another 23:22, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — lack of verifiable sources besides what is stated above that can remotely establish notability of this game (i.e. no significant coverage). MuZemike (talk) 19:51, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note — Realore Studios as well as many other of its games have been proposed for deletion for the same reasons as in this AfD. MuZemike (talk) 19:51, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.