Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie X
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:30, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Jamie X[edit]
- Jamie X (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable musician, fails WP:NMUSIC, contested prod Jezhotwells (talk) 02:02, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Jezhotwells (talk) 02:03, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Jezhotwells (talk) 02:04, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Regards, MacMedtalkstalk 22:15, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]- Notability has not been established. Although many sources have been posted, unfortunately none satisfy WP:GNG. I guess that makes it delete.--Yeti Hunter (talk) 20:47, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, Fails WP:NMUSIC. Sources provided do not provide significant coverage of this musician. A search for other sources doesn't come up with much, therefore fails WP:N. Auseplot (talk) 21:43, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.