Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Summers
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Stifle (talk) 19:36, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Jamie Summers[edit]
- Jamie Summers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No reliable sources, and doesn't pass the criteria at WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 (talk) 10:36, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Although she is verifiable I agree with the nom that she does not pass WP:PORNBIO. --Pmedema (talk) 20:19, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Raven1977 (talk) 03:45, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Popular Vivid girl in the 80s. She was one of the main subjects in a book about 80-90s porn.[1][2]. I remember Jamie Loves Jeff was considered a groundbreaking movie/blockbuster (criteria 2 of WP:PORNBIO) at the time since that was Jeff Stryker's crossover movie.[3][4][5] Morbidthoughts (talk) 04:27, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:25, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per the information provided by Morbidthoughts; I would encourage the information cited be added to the article to address the unsourced concerns. If by chance this article is deleted consideration should be given to making it a redirect to Jaime Sommers as a reasonable search variation for the fictional character. 23skidoo (talk) 07:06, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.