Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Schwartzman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 04:30, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Jamie Schwartzman[edit]
- Jamie Schwartzman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Vanispamcruftisement. Contested prod. MER-C 05:42, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete Vanity article with no notable accomplishments. Clarityfiend 05:52, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete Vanity, COI, and my oh my, what a mess. Created and edited (essentially) only by User:Fluxbiz (talk • contribs), who is the subject of the article. (see the first edit by user in December). Then there's Generation My, which says
- "The idea was developed by Jamie Schwartzman in 2004. The thesis is is being written, and he holds URLs for www.GenerationMy.com and www.GenMy.com."
- An article about a thesis being written? Oh my. And created and edited only by User:Fluxbiz. Which only has one inbound link from Jamie Schwartzman, which itself has only one inbound link, from Generation My. Oh my my. Anybody see WP:COI? Delete both Shenme 06:16, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Perhaps a speedy as nonsense. DGG 07:29, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per nom. Thewinchester (talk) 05:13, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.