Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Paterson (presenter)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 10:32, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jamie Paterson (presenter)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unsourced WP:BLP of a radio host associated exclusively with a single mid-sized media market. This does not satisfy our inclusion standards for broadcasters — a radio personality needs to have a national profile, such as being on the CBC or airing nationally in syndication, or at least be reliably sourceable as getting over WP:GNG on pure volume of available sourcing. But neither of those have been demonstrated or even attempted here. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 21:45, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I've seen the occasional references to him made by reliable sources, in my own searching, but he seems to fall below the bar of notability as stated above. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 23:05, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't find anything about him. I assume that there may be sources that cover his local market area, so I'll check back to see if anyone closer to the "Maritime region" (wherever that is! - there are, after all, two coasts) finds anything. LaMona (talk) 01:58, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In the Canadian context, "Maritimes" is reserved specifically for the east coast provinces of NB, PE and NS, rather than the "left coast" in BC. Just so you know for future reference. Bearcat (talk) 17:35, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nova Scotia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:49, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:49, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:49, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:49, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:49, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't see WP:RS that would cause this subject to pass WP:GNG. --Jersey92 (talk) 14:09, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as my searches found nothing more than two links (news article and and a radio website) and thus no signs of improvement. SwisterTwister talk 02:41, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.