Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Fullerton
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 16:47, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Jamie Fullerton[edit]
- Jamie Fullerton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Seems like a minor player in a barely notable event. Google News Archives picks up a bunch false positives, with none pertaining to him. At most, he's a WP:BLP1E. Therefore, Delete. brewcrewer (yada, yada) 01:07, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 08:54, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wow, he gave a notable person a ride. This is taking the idea of the transference of notability to new heights. Movingboxes (talk) 08:55, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Arguably, Pete Doherty being released from jail isn't a notable event, so this isn't even WP:BLP1E. AlexTiefling (talk) 11:37, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete just another non- notable music journalist. Tovian (talk) 18:32, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - being an assistant editor isn't really notable, and without a greater publishing history I don't think he meets WP:BIO. Tony Fox (arf!) 22:49, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.