Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Curry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow Delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:15, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jamie Curry[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article fails WP:BIO. I've had a good look, but the only mention in the media that I could find is what is currently ref #2. Schwede 66 18:51, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Suspected self-promotion. Creator has only edited this article. Otherwise, surely fails WP:N. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 20:57, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. gadfium 19:30, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I proded it a few days ago, and I still can't see any significant coverage in independent reliable sources. The-Pope (talk) 05:43, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, definitive fail of BIO. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 07:24, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - She is funny but only Internet famous - SimonLyall (talk) 09:50, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I am personally a fan of her Facebook page, but unfortunately she is only "World famous in New Zealand" and doesn't meet WP:N. -- Patchy1 REF THIS BLP 10:54, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:54, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:54, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't know if Facebook likes are an assertion of importance, but this smells like it should have been A7ed. No notability whatsoever. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 16:50, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree re A7. It was my plan, but I was using Twinkle for the first time for an AfD, and it didn't give me that option. Weighing up between being able to find out how Twinkle deals with AfDs and putting up the A7 manually, I opted for the former. Sorry to put everyone through this pain. Regarding the world famous in New Zealand comment above, I had a look at her Facebook page as part of my research on notability. She's got quite an output, and many of her contributions are rather witty. If she keeps it up, I'm sure that she will reach the notability threshold at some point. Schwede 66 17:34, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No biggie, judging from the !votes at this point it's essentially just a longer-lasting A7 §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:03, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of notability as a blogger or comedian, one source for notability as an amateur sports player. Gamaliel (talk) 17:18, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.