Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James ashford

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was A7 by Herbythyme , non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 14:58, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

James ashford[edit]

Notability is not asserted. Omarcheeseboro (talk) 13:49, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Notability is asserted, but simply doesn't bear any scrutiny. Links only to school website, starbucks where he works etc. This page is cleverly written to get around a speedy on bio, nothing more. --Ged UK (talk) 13:53, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for not asserting notability. A quick look at the contribs of user:Jamesthefool tells a familiar story. OBM | ^{blah blah blah} 14:07, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete I'd say that extremely vague and/or obviously ridiculous assertations of notability shouldn't be treated as assertations of notability at all. Bottom line: articles like this aren't worth five seconds of our time, much less five days. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:15, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - As the assertion that he's 'The Right Honourable' is patently false, I think we can class the creation of the article as vandalism. AlexTiefling (talk) 14:39, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.