Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Odorczyk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 02:24, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

James Odorczyk

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about an entreprenuer/business person which does not appear to meet notability as there lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources. The article has only one source (local news), and my own search turns up very little. The best result I could find was him being quoted in this book. The article has had a variety of claims to notability, but none of them are backed up with any sources. See Talk:James Odorczyk for an anlysis of the the claims. There 10 references noted in the anlysis comes from a much earlier version of the article. See this version. Whpq (talk) 11:54, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 17:17, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^*poke* 19:47, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. — Frankie (talk) 05:11, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom's arguments above. - Finnegas (talk) 10:15, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.