Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Luxford

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. apparent harassment of subject, based on article history.. I rarely support a subject's own request to delete, but this is a clear BLP violation--& I agree he's not N. DGG ( talk ) 02:38, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

James Luxford

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject requests deletion at OTRS Ticket:2010031810041228; seems borderline on notability and I support his request. Stifle (talk) 08:03, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom as well as non-notable film critic. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 17:51, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:39, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I have restore the version as it was when Stifle AfD'd it. (Most of the content w was subsequently deleted by an unregistered user). DGG ( talk ) 22:44, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:N. I can find plenty of coverage by Luxford but no significant coverage of him. - DustFormsWords (talk) 01:11, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.