Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Limborg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 09:51, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

James Limborg[edit]

Although the artist has toured with notable artists (the Jets and Prince) there is no indication that he has notability on his own. The creating editor (who shares a name with a subject) is unwilling to discuss the article or tags and keeps removing them without responding to comments. Fails WP:N Movingboxes (talk) 08:10, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

KeepAt this stage, it seems that the subject is bordering notability and IMO I think it should be kept. The article itself is well written, neutral, and sourced leaving WP:COI as the only major problem.

Cheers mate!

Λuα ^{(Operibus anteire)} 09:03, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment My concern is that there are no third-party sources and I have been unable to locate any. Movingboxes (talk) 09:14, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The only major problem is the lack of third-party reliable sources to prove his notability. An effort has been made to find such sources (by Movingboxes), yet there are none. Plrk (talk) 10:08, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Don't think he's notable enough, so fails WP:N. Chris (talk) 10:15, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - trivial coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 01:19, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.