Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Kisina

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete per WP:BLP and WP:SNOW. Nick Dowling (talk) 09:00, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

James Kisina[edit]

Notable only for being the half-brother of convicted drug smuggler, Schapelle Corby. If it wasn't for his family connections, none of us would have even bothered to remember his name. His own crimes barely rate a mention. Longhair\^talk 00:04, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Longhair\^talk 00:05, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:BLP1E. Should possibly be speedied to prevent further harm to the subject. What purpose does this article (and others like it) serve other than to disparage the subject. His crimes are not of a nature to be notable enough for inclusion in an encyclopedia and most of the detail regarding the Corby case is half-baked rumour now specifically denied by the police. Not to editorialise too much, but the people we write about here are real people with real feelings and their dignity should be respected, regardless of one's personal feelings towards the subject. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 00:18, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per BLP.5E, it wasn't even an event, he's a historical footnote lacking encyclopedic notability. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 00:30, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and above comments. Appears to be a garden-variety criminal of no particular individual notability. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 00:32, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:ONEEVENT Artene50 (talk) 04:02, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, precisely the type of person for whom WP:ONEEVENT exists. Optionally redirect to Schapelle Corby#James Kisina's arrest. --Dhartung | Talk 05:35, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - certainly not notable enough to arrive at an article here.--VS ^talk 07:46, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - may fail notability standards. Guroadrunner (talk) 07:51, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.