Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Hall (British Army soldier)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:41, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

James Hall (British Army soldier)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SOLDIER. Also completely uncited. Lettler^hello 14:02, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lettler^hello 14:02, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Lettler^hello 14:02, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Lettler^hello 14:02, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this gentleman does not pass WP:NSOLDIER#1 because his awards do not meet our standard. ...or were awarded their nation's second-highest award for valour (such as the Navy Cross) multiple times. His military rank, and his participation in the war do not meet the standard set by our SNG. Additionally RS cannot be found for this soldier leaving us without WP:N Lightburst (talk) 16:32, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and also WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:30, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete DCM doesn't meet #1 of WP:SOLDIER and fails WP:GNG. Mztourist (talk) 03:23, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.