Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James E. Wolfe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:01, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

James E. Wolfe[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and MUSIC. Speedy declined by Adam9007. Toddst1 (talk) 17:36, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete Where is any sort of notability claimed? Being married to someone notable doesn't impart notability, and any musical notability is local at best. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:00, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, but not A7. Consensus was that a strong association to a notable subject can constitute a credible claim of significance. Both working with and being married to a notable subject is a particularly strong association. Despite that, not notable, as noted above; notability can't be inherited, even if a credible claim of significance can be. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 21:08, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete but I don't think speedy applies. He's not notable, but it's not some gross attack page or ad. White Arabian Filly ^Neigh 21:38, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the article has been improved to the point where it survives A7, but clearly still fails any notability test you want to throw at it. Tazerdadog (talk) 00:07, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no indication of notability, almost no sources seem to cover this person. Also, I am not seeing that his music made the charts. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 17:08, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A CCS might be based on association, but notability is not inherited; and in this case, I can see no other claim to notability either. Vanamonde93 (talk) 04:41, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, does not meet WP:ANYBIO or WP:GNG, a gsearch brings up nothing useable, ie. youtube and facebook (and then a whole lot of genealogical records of deceased wolfes:) Coolabahapple (talk) 19:20, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.