Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Curcio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. If the user wants the contents for their userpage and doesn't have a copy then message me on my talk I'd be happy to userfy. Petros471 18:31, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

James Curcio[edit]

Uncited and unverifiable autobiographical page created by subject [1] of the article. -999 13:10, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy. -999 13:12, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom ... looks like he is trying to use WP as part of his viral marketing strategy. Paddles ^T_C 16:25, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nominator points out all the points quite well at this one, its a simple decision. Kevin_b_er 22:54, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect This wasn't done as some sort of 'trick,' a number of pages were directing to "James Curcio" and there was no article there. My suggested solution: Truncate and merge information with Join My Cult entry. Redirect "James Curcio" to that page; delete this entry. Agent139 01:54, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment He was basically only related to two articles, Join My Cult and Bard College. Stuff related to the Atlantic County Board of Chosen Freeholders is not the same guy [2], and you yourself added him and a new section to Babalon and created the article Chasing the wish. So really, he was only on two articles, of which one of them, Bard College could be contestable as to how important he is to be mentioned that article. Kevin_b_er 22:54, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think a google search of "james curcio" and the list of publications makes the bard college entry clear enough. The earlier suggestion that anyone with any marketing sense would use a wikipost as 'viral advertising' is a little silly since the amount of traffic that comes off wiki is negligiable at best. The join my cult entry appears to contain most of the relevant information that this entry contains however so deleting it makes sense.68.37.90.124 07:50, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.