Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Boroff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:39, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

James Boroff[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While the article is now sourced, the person isn't N enough to meet WP:POLITICIAN. Ref 2 doesn't back up the statement that it is supposed to reference and would be considered trivial coverage. Putting his name into google news brings back one hit that is also trivial. Guerillero | My Talk 15:44, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Falls pretty far short on WP:POLITICIAN. Yakushima (talk) 16:06, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:35, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:35, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Mayors of small cities have not been considered notable enough for us in the past. When and if he gets elected to the state legislature, then he will notable enough. Bearian (talk) 21:55, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The town is too small for its mayor to be notable. Qworty (talk) 02:06, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.