Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamee Ranta
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 21:38, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jamee Ranta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Producer. Refs are primary, interviews and profiles. Nominated for grammy but never won. Very poor references. scope_creepTalk 11:42, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Ohio. Shellwood (talk) 11:56, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG; WP:MUSICBIO. Producer not notable. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:52, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Nothing I see shows notability. Pamelagoo (talk) 17:02, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The Billboard feature was the primary independent source to est WP:GNG Mistephake (talk) 13:35, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Primary references can't be used to establish notability. There is no secondary references here. scope_creepTalk 15:10, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:37, 15 June 2022 (UTC)- Thank you all for your comments and careful reading. Jamee is a prominent producer of music videos for some of the top artists in the country, and I would have thought that the Billboard and Dayton News pieces would establish notability. Perhaps a shorter article would pass muster?
- Bethbcpr (talk) 23:54, 15 June 2022 (UTC)BethBC
- Delete The Billboard piece is all I can find and it's not a reliable source as discussed above. Overly promotional article as well. Oaktree b (talk) 01:27, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.