Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamaica Craft

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:43, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jamaica Craft

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Little coverage in independent, reliable sources to suggest she passes biographical notability standards. Her biggest claim to fame is working with Usher and notability isn't inherited. DrStrauss talk 11:21, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:24, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:24, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:24, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:25, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The notability claim of being a backup dancer is not convincing. Article full of OR and sourced by a single non-RS webzine. Seems to be a fanpage. Agricola44 (talk) 14:31, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:05, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:19, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:48, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Very weak delete - Although there is some coverage in independent and reliable sources, there just isn't enough. The state of the article just pushes this over the line for me. If this could be cleaned up, then I would be willing to change my vote to a keep. RileyBugz ^会話 _投稿記録 02:35, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a backup performer not indepdently notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:35, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.