Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jama Masjid, Chitarkoni

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Chitarkoni. (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 16:08, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Jama Masjid, Chitarkoni

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Jama Masjid, Chitarkoni (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was deprodded with the rationale, "deprod; 17C buildings are generally notable, even in countries which do not have good heritage listing; take to AfD". Now, sometimes I have to laugh at myself, as it took me days to realize that 17C referred to 17th century. I was thinking more along the lines of the Indian version of NHRP. And while I agree with the deprodder's rationale, my issue with the article is that the single source does not appear to mention the article's subject at all. So I wasn't sure that this building, as described in the article, even exists. It's been tagged for a month with improvement tags, without any attempt at improvement. Right now, it fails WP:VERIFY. Searches turned up zero coverage. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:07, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:32, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:32, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

• Redirect to Chitarkoni since all of this content is already included in that article and this is an unnecessary fork. Mccapra (talk) 15:55, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:16, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

• Redirect as suggested above. Prose is essentially just pulled from Chitarkoni article and this article doesn't stand up on its own. May have scope for future expansion, so redirecting can at least preserve the current state in article history. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 13:25, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.