Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jakob Nybo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:17, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jakob Nybo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertorially toned WP:BLP of a person with no clear notability claim per WP:NPOL; as near as I can suss from how badly the article is written, he's been a political organizer and an as yet non-winning candidate in a future city council election, but has held no political office. The sourcing isn't getting him over WP:GNG for anything, either -- there are two primary sources, two YouTube videos, one source which tangentially verifies the existence of a company named in the article but fails to contain Nybo's name in conjunction with it, and one source which namechecks Nybo in the context of being a local football coach rather than in the context of anything political. There's also a probable conflict of interest here, as the subject edited the article himself just 16 minutes after it was created (and how else could he have known it was here that quickly, but for the article being created by a friend or associate of his?) There's simply nothing here, neither in the substance nor the sourcing, that counts as notability for Wikipedia purposes. Bearcat (talk) 03:42, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 03:43, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 03:43, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Everything nom said. Plus the fact that the article reads like it was written by his a couple of his buddies on somebody's laptop one night in a bar after a few rounds of Tuborg.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:49, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 00:02, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar 20:31, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the article is of extremely poor quality, and there's no clear claim of notability. I'm not convinced the article even discusses a single person. Power~enwiki (talk) 00:29, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Very poor quality article. No evidence of significant notability. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 01:14, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.