Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jakkajan Wanwisa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 22:12, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jakkajan Wanwisa[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP that has been moved to draft space twice and moved back twice without following procedure. This has been deleted from Thai Wikipedia on multiple occasions as well. A search comes up with a thinly-veiled advert for cosmetic surgery, this piece which looks like it might be sponsored in some way and I have no idea what this is meant to be about. Spiderone 08:39, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:40, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:40, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:40, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:41, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless anyone is able to find Thai sources. Mccapra (talk) 10:26, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - A search under her Thai name จั๊กจั่น วันวิสา leads to some more results but they are clearly self-created social media posts and a few promotional announcements. I wonder if shysters are using her image against her will in sleazy ads... if so that is unfortunate but they don't serve as reliable sources here either. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 15:15, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The article creator has not been notified of the AfD, due to a previous cut-&-paste move. --Paul_012 (talk) 15:24, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Coverage by Kapook.com[1], Thairath[2] and Kom-Chad-Luek[3] (the last appears to be an advertorial). --Paul_012 (talk) 15:32, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The first one establishes some info and some notability but the other two seem very promotional, in my view. The second one looks like a thinly-veiled advert for cosmetic surgery. The third one doesn't even try to hide the fact that it's an ad. Very strange as Thairath is a broadsheet and broadsheets don't usually have articles like that. Is Kom-Chad-Luek like the Thai version of The Sun or Daily Mail? Spiderone 23:15, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thai newspapers are usually positioned as mass/sansationalist vs upmarket/quality, though all are broadsheet in size. Both Thairath and Kom-Chad-Luek fall in the sensationalist camp, but while they do feature celebrity gossip, most of their coverage is serious and not as trashy as British tabloids. Their online counterparts, however, don't always match the print papers' reputation. The Thairath piece certainly is written as a gossip column, so it could probably be discounted as reliable coverage. --Paul_012 (talk) 12:35, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Also found coverage of her on IsanGate.com[4]. It appears to be a serious content-oriented website running since 1998, but it's a one-man operation so maybe a bit borderline reliability-wise. --Paul_012 (talk) 12:35, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I placed the missing AfD banner on the nominated article. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 11:52, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.