Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaki Crush
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 17:36, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Jaki Crush[edit]
- Jaki Crush (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested WP:PROD. No reason was provided by the contesting editor, so I'll just copy-and-paste my reasoning from the prod: Fails to meet WP:NGAMES. No indication of notability - on the contrary, the article outright declares that the subject is "very obscure" - and only one cited source. Martin IIIa (talk) 16:17, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Martin IIIa (talk) 16:19, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - Seems to have a few different reviews on Mobygames [1]. With it being a Japanese game release (from 1992), I find it hard to believe it doesn't have paper coverage. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 16:41, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - Covered in Superplay 05, N-Force 10, GamePower Brazil 08, Markt & Technik's Video Games, April '93, and Aktueller Software Markt, April '93. These are all independently published magazines featuring non-trivial coverage of Jaki Crush. FlotillaFlotsam (talk) 13:02, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.