Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake McCollough

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:BIO. PeterSymonds (talk) 15:52, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jake McCollough[edit]

The subject of this article has only appeared in one film, with a likely small role. StaticGull Talk 15:45, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, his role in the film was a rather large one as the child John Bates... i should know... he's my cousin —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrmccollough (talk • contribs) 15:48, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete one role is NOT notable, you seem to have a nasty habbit of creating unsuitable articles. Chafford (talk) 15:51, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @Mrmccollough:

That poses a conflict of interests too, then. StaticGull Talk 16:04, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:N outright, even interpreting in the most positive light. Jclemens (talk) 19:42, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 20:24, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Certainly fails WP:N. He's just not notable at present. Maybe in a few years time but not now. Artene50 (talk) 09:49, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While one role could be notable, playing a child in a redlinked film is not a notable role. Edward321 (talk) 00:07, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete other than Mrmccollough, who cares. JuJube (talk) 18:31, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.