Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Linford
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 13:41, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
- Jake Linford (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find evidence that the article subject meets WP:PROF. Marquardtika (talk) 14:06, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 17:56, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 17:56, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 17:56, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Associate professor who does not meet WP:PROF. agtx 18:01, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Only 71 cites on GS, not remotely enough WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:38, 24 October 2017 (UTC).
- Delete. Fails WP:Prof, not notable for stand alone article. Kierzek (talk) 18:25, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:PROF.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:28, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.