Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Coco

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 06:38, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jake Coco[edit]

Previously tagged for speedy deletion and contested - now up for community discussion --VS ^talk 14:36, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete possibly has potential for notability, but as is, it looks like another attempt with another website other than YouTube to gain some fame. Jauerback 14:42, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable yet, though one day who knows? This article appears to be part of a slew of {{db-wannabe}} articles based around upcoming projects of Alliance Group Entertainment that have been appearing over the last few days. [Later edit: a related similar article is for Sam Sarpong, who's another borderline notable, except he's an award winning model.] ROGER ^TALK 15:05, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete only trivial mentions found through a google archive search Corpx 20:22, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Very Strong Keep, he is notable, plenty on him, he came from no where on web to signing for a major label. Callelinea 23:42, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep while I look for independent sources. It seems this guy meets the music notability guideline, but just needs some sourcing. VanTucky ^(talk) 00:21, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 15:51, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Having gone through the WP:MUSIC criteria, I don't think he satisfies any one of them. For instance, I can't find any non-trivial sources on the internet, and he's only released one album, and the label may not really be major.--Kylohk 03:00, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I tried to cleanup for WP:NPOV but does not seem to satisfy WP:Music to me. Anyone can be on YouTube so that is not notable either and deleted such. And weeding through the author's contributions, seems he is from the Alliance Group (per above) and is clearly only here to promote artists signed to them, as can be seen HERE because he actually even claims to have created the logo of which he released on GFDL. I suggest HanukaGuy read up on Wikipedia's policies about What Wikipedia Is Not; specifically, Wikipedia is not advertising space. Cricket02 06:51, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.