Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jakartabeat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:55, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jakartabeat

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Trimmed off the fluff (employee directory, etc) and what we have is a website with no real reliable sources, one weak source, and its own primary source. Searching finds blogs, twitter, facebook and the like. Comes up short in WP:WEB or WP:GNG. Dennis Brown (talk) 19:56, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The web magazine has been around for only 3 years, and the lack of reliable sources reinforces my conception that it is unlikely to have made any notable contribution to society, music or the like. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 20:15, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As per nom and above. Osarius Talk 22:06, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.