Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaime Lagunez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 01:38, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jaime Lagunez

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Borderline speedyable advert; zero third-party reliable sources for WP:BIO, insufficient sourcing for WP:NACADEMIC. Prod was disputed. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:29, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Science, and Biology. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 12:08, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Oh, he's influential? Delete for lack of sources. Oaktree b (talk) 02:41, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Indeed this researcher is, please help edit accordingly:

See several links:

Petitions - Climate Emergency Declaration

[united-nations-we-live-climate-collapse-have-the-united-nations-declare-state-of-planetary-emergency Petition · Our Collapsed Climate - Have the United Nations declare State of Planetary Emergency · Change.org]

Male Changemakers In The Sustainable Living Community - Zero Waste Lifestyle System

Furthermore he is the leader of the @FrenteCivico an organization that has won the National Human Rights Award in Mexico.:

https://twitter.com/Frentecivico

(Over 100k posts on these subjects) 2806:104E:C:1B11:943:3CA0:4160:D036 (talk) 17:40, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment You'll want to review our WP:Reliable sources policy; none of those sources qualify towards notability. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:50, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We need articles about him in reliable journals, newspapers, books, magazines or the like. Not things he's written or speeches he's made. A New York Times article about the gentleman would be a perfect example of what's needed for GNG here. Oaktree b (talk) 17:56, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for lack of sources? I'd delete for lack of sense. But as we fail WP:GNG, I'd delete for that instead. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:24, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The sources are definitely there but it would be best to add as references. OF COURSE it makes sense. Few topics are as important as environmental activism, or cancer and HIV research. Furthermore the proposal for a worldwide cooperative company will no doubt make a change in the world.

This article is a keeper. 2806:104E:C:1B11:943:3CA0:4160:D036 (talk) 17:44, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG Equine-man (talk) 12:13, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; subject not notable and the article reads like self-promotion. Dylnuge ^{(Talk • Edits)} 14:58, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, we should KEEP the article...allow me to explain. See below.. 2806:104E:C:1B11:943:3CA0:4160:D036 (talk) 17:23, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:DISCUSSAFD. You should provide a rationale for your !vote. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:25, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Those invited to the Techfest lectures are Nobel Prize winners and heads of state. This article speaks of notable activities. Yes, it's a Keep. 2806:104E:C:1B11:943:3CA0:4160:D036 (talk) 17:47, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So provide articles that discuss them at length. "Because I say they are" isn't notable. Oaktree b (talk) 00:41, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - this "influential" activist and scientist who's "greatest achievements of mankind and trigger a trillion dollar economy of healing biomedical procedures" is not yet notable per WP inclusion criteria for WP:GNG nor WP:NACADEMIC. Netherzone (talk) 18:46, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.