Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaiden Animations

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:59, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jaiden Animations[edit]

Jaiden Animations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This initially came as a slightly different request on VRTS ticket # 2017092110027894 to remove information, but upon further inspection I find that neither Jaiden the YouTube personality nor Jaiden the person are at all notable. I can find no in-depth coverage online, and the references included in the article are little more than school newspapers and self-published sources. Thus, she does not meet WP:GNG. Primefac (talk) 19:26, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Does not meet WP:GNG, appalling sources, and objections by the subject. I just removed the personal information in question. Starting an AFD would have been my next step. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 19:36, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete no evidence of recoginition. Staszek Lem (talk) 21:15, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete insufficiently notable. Main source is SPS. Sorry. Collect (talk) 00:28, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Does not meet the criteria of WP:GNG for an article in the encyclopedia. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:13, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.