Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jagvir Singh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. (non-admin closure)The Aafī (talk) 04:56, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jagvir Singh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Did not appear for the Brøndby IF yet, in which he signed January this year. Fails WP:NFOOTY and possibly a case of WP:TOOSOON. Chirota (talk) 01:32, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Chirota (talk) 01:32, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 07:25, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 07:25, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi guys, Let me know what to do in order to not delete the site. I’m new to this, but i’ve used all sources that exists on the bio. I find it odd, that Jagvir Singh is the only player in the Brøndby squad, that doesn’t have a wiki-page. Best, /Per

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 07:26, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 07:57, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move to draftspace until he makes a first team appearance, as a valid WP:ATD. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:40, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move to draftspace until first WP:FPL appearance, which seems possible in the next 6–12 months. Paul Vaurie (talk) 17:06, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - fails WP:GNG as there is no significant coverage about him. Doesn't matter if he appears in a game tomorrow, he still needs significant coverage. The FAQ from the top of WP:NFOOTBALL makes it crystal clear that all sport figures need to pass WP:GNG

    Q2: If a sports figure meets the criteria specified in a sports-specific notability guideline, does this mean he/she does not have to meet the general notability guideline?
    A2: No, the article must still eventually provide sources indicating that the subject meets the general notability guideline. Although the criteria for a given sport should be chosen to be a very reliable predictor of the availability of appropriate secondary coverage from reliable sources, there can be exceptions. For contemporary persons, given a reasonable amount of time to locate appropriate sources, the general notability guideline should be met in order for an article to meet Wikipedia's standards for inclusion. (For subjects in the past where it is more difficult to locate sources, it may be necessary to evaluate the subject's likely notability based on other persons of the same time period with similar characteristics.)

    Alvaldi (talk) 19:32, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move to draftspace, and I'm not entirely convinced he doesn't pass WP:GNG, lots of good and relevant sources out there for him.--Ortizesp (talk) 05:19, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ortizesp: Could you please post the best three good an relevant sources you found on the subject to help us determine if he passes WP:GNG? Alvaldi (talk) 11:16, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I think that these references already on page are good enough: 1, 2, 3, 4.--Ortizesp (talk) 14:21, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fenix down (talk) 10:19, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fenix down (talk) 22:35, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.