Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jagdish Vyom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:59, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jagdish Vyom[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Could not find any sources to document notability. On Google and in article all are blogs or WP:SPS or unreliable. Note: User:Dr.jagdish is the subject of this article. Hindust@ni^{क्या करें? बातें!} 08:35, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources which shows his notability [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] --Jeeteshvaishya (talk) 13:26, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quick note - I've undone the hatting and converted all links above to links which is alot more easier for readers than the prev formatting, Cheers, –Davey2010^Talk 21:58, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, As I said the sources are unreliable or self published. Like see this link of Kavitaakosh where it shows Jagdish Vyom as member. Bharatdiscovery.org is a wiki like Wikipedia. Google books shows a poem wriiten by him. (Not sufficient for notability, what we will write in the article, his poem?) Youtube is not a reliable source either. Because it is user generated. The rest of the sources you provided are directories. It shows that person exists but do not prove notability. Only Deshbandhu can be termed reliable but in the article, it says nothing about him. Incidentally it is written by Jagdish Vyom himself.--Hindust@ni^{क्या करें? बातें!} 14:44, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:42, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have introduced some reliable sources. Please you can find it. Thank you --Jeeteshvaishya (talk) 12:40, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:31, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:49, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.