Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jagdish Chandra Natali

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. SarahStierch (talk) 03:25, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jagdish Chandra Natali[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Did get MNZM but that is well down on the list of New Zealand Royal Honours System. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:34, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 December 5. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 07:36, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

keep as per New Years honour. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:18, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 01:09, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

keep as per New Years honour NealeFamily (talk) 00:05, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Is the honours enough? Given the lack of any decent independent coverage and the large numbers handed out I'd say no. It's well down the list of NZ Honours and Commonwealth honours have a poor precedence at AfD. OAM, deleted, OAM, deleted, AM, deleted, BEM, deleted, OAM, deleted, OAM, deleted, AM, keep, AM, keep. Looks like by themselves there is a bad record and only they are kept with other supporting evidence. Wikipedians' notice board discussion. duffbeerforme (talk) 23:07, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I know nothing about the Australian system, but both if the mnzm's I've put the time into came out with the sources, Stuartyeates (talk) 09:01, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: MNZM is a respectable NZ honour ;shows that he is considered important as an activist for his community in NZ.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.