Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jagannath International Management School, Vasant Kunj

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No one was able to provide sourcing to show that this subject meets our notability guidelines. Missvain (talk) 15:39, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jagannath International Management School, Vasant Kunj

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Self published references. lack of WP:SIGCOV and WP:CORPDEPTH. GermanKity (talk) 12:43, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 12:43, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 12:43, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 12:43, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:18, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: A degree-awarding college affiliated with GGSIPU should be presumed notable. Over the course of time, users (that may not be aware of Wikipedia policies) added content and provided primary sources. If you check the historical versions (oldest version when I created it) it had secondary sources. This article shouldn't be deleted but instead clean up should be done as per WP:ATD Dial911 (talk) 01:26, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have restored it to the most neutral form. But when I did that, the notice of deletion vanished from the page itself. Dial911 (talk) 01:31, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:56, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a private, tertiary, non-degree awarding educational institution having no WP:RS and thus fails to adhere to WP:NSCHOOLS. VV 19:30, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Fails NSCHOOL. AgentCody 05:30, 30 May 2021 (UTC) strike per WP:SOCKSTRIKE and this. -- Toddy1 (talk) 07:41, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this is a private institution and therefore has to pass WP:NORG. Which it clearly doesn't due to the lack of good sources. So from my perspective there isn't a guideline based reason to keep the article. Unless someone can provide WP:THREE in-depth, secondary references to help it pass WP:NORG. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:32, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheChronium 17:18, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Vague sources. [1], [2] & [3] like this can't showcase notability. Sonofstar (talk) 13:18, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.