Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jagan Nath University, Jaipur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 23:37, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jagan Nath University, Jaipur

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article whose only sources come from the school's website. No neutral sources are used as this clearly fails WP:NORG and GNG. The article almost feels it is written in a promotional manner than in an encyclopedic one. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:24, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following page because it's a related subject that also doesn't meet general notability guidelines:

This page was nominated for deletion back in March 2019 and the result was no consensus. But it clearly fails both GNG and NORG as there aren't many or plenty of sources used that establish the notability of the society. The first source is from the organization's website, the second source is in fact a promotional piece touting how great one of their schools is. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:24, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:28, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:28, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:28, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:50, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both From what I can tell all the references in both except for one in the article about the society are primary and (or) otherwise not usable for notability. I don't think single article from The Telegraph is enough to justify keeping on the article about the society either. Let is it enough to keep the article about the university. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:47, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Straight away delete. Very much similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vogue Institute of Art & Design. But, at that time ... few IDs with vested interest hoodwinked us. Eventually, those who tried to deviate the outcome of AfD article got blocked. -Hatchens (talk) 16:33, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.