Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaecyn Bayne

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:38, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jaecyn Bayne

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Although seeming notable and acceptable at first, I actually see nothing to suggest this isn't anything but puffery and namedropping connections; the best my searches found were only some passing mentions here. Notifying past AfC decliner Ktr101. SwisterTwister talk 06:39, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 07:05, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 07:05, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I fail to see how he has become more notable in almost three years (especially since a rather new editor was the one who moved it), but the amount of notability is pretty much the same as before and I do not see a reason to keep the article at this time. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 16:10, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Searches turned up only passing mentions, and regurgitated press releases on News, nothing on Newspapers, Scholar or Highbeam. Books only had a hit back to the Wikipedia article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:28, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.