Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jade Starr

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:50, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jade Starr[edit]

Jade Starr (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails gng and pornbio Spartaz Humbug! 23:24, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:59, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:05, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:05, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:05, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Nothing to suggest even minimally better notability. SwisterTwister talk 03:10, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Does not meet notability requirements for ponographic performers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:00, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Fails PORNBIO, no awards, just scene-related nominations. No independent reliable sourcing. Claimed "mainstream" credits are non-featured roles in non-notable films, mostly if not entirely softcore erotica. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 17:58, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Unfortunately looks don't count towards notability ...., Anyway she fails PORNBIO & GNG so delete./ –Davey2010Talk 00:58, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.