Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jade M. Marlin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:53, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jade M. Marlin[edit]

Jade M. Marlin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An advertorially toned BLP that does not meet WP:BIO or WP:CREATIVE. Significant RS coverage not found; clearly WP:TOOSOON per review of available sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:39, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:03, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:03, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: The two referenced interviews describe the subject's ambitions but do not indicate attained encyclopaedic notability. Nor are my searches finding better. Fails WP:ANYBIO, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 07:09, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:46, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Aunva6talk - contribs 14:35, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.