Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jade Hopper

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:11, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jade Hopper[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not notable enough tennis player for a WP bio Mayumashu (talk) 02:12, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as article fails notability criteria for tennis players. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 07:08, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:50, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:50, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lack of sources shows any form of notability. Yankeefan233 (talk) 14:45, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination withdrawn Discussion needed on better keep/delete guidelines for tennis bios per this talk [1] Mayumashu (talk) 17:22, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm not seeing any notability here? JBsupreme (talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 22:41, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:18, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: Withdrawn nomination with three unanimous "delete" !votes. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:19, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Passes WP:TENNIS/N since she has won a title in an ITF $25,000 tournament. Arteyu ? _{Blame it on me !} 00:43, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as it passes notability criteria for tennis players. She has won a ITF $25,000 tournament. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 02:12, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.