Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jad Allah Al-Qurani

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 09:54, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jad Allah Al-Qurani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There seem to be no good, secondary sources about this person. The film they refer to was about a Jewish boy, and it looks as if some "conspiracy theory" or similar is doing the rounds on some fora about this being in fact based on some until then unknown Arab(?) boy who converted "millions" of people. Seems like a fringe theory which doesn't belong on enwiki, but perhaps it is true and I just haven't found the right sources? Fram (talk) 08:40, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 08:40, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 08:40, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 08:40, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • This article is written after authentic sources.Please not to Delete it.There is movie also made about this person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Muhammad236 (talkcontribs) 2021-05-14T08:56:39 (UTC)
  • Delete - I vigorously attempted to find any information I could on the subject because I understand the passion one feels for certain topics. However, I found out very little outside of the things the nominator has already mentioned. There aren't any good secondary sources by which to draw from for notability. The subject fails the encyclopedia's basic notability guideline (See WP:GNG) --ARoseWolf 15:50, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete since I also cannot find any mention of this person in reliable sources. But I agree that it's possible that if you know the right search string in the right language then there is enough out there to pass GNG, so I will watch the discussion and change my !vote if someone does succeed in turning up enough references. - Astrophobe (talk) 23:08, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.