Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacula (fumetti)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -- Sam ^Sing! 21:50, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jacula (fumetti)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Google results are blogs, social media, and wikis. Mr. Guye (talk) 21:42, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 21:52, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Snow keep I have no idea which kind of WP:BEFORE the nominator has done, obviously a general Google research for a comic which ended its publications 33 years ago could be difficult, but it requires very little effort to find dozens of reputable sources in Google Books, including The Vampire Book: The Encyclopedia of the Undead by J. Gordon Melton which refers to the comics as "possibly the most successful vampire comic book of all time" or Drawn and Dangerous: Italian Comics of the 1970s and 1980s by Simone Castaldi which cites Jacula "among the most popular, and the least amateurish" Italian fumetti. It is so notable as to name several books covering the topic of the Italian "fumetti vietati", eg Pornograffiti: da Jacula a Oltretomba, da Cappucetto Rotto a Mercenari by Laura Barbiani and Alberto Abruzzese, Sukia, Jacula, De Sade, Lando, Il Tromba: la grande epopea della Edifumetto di Milano by Giovan Battista Brambilla and Vietato ai minori. Vamp e vampire: Jacula, Zora, Sukia e Yra by Graziano Origa. Note that the Spanish version of the article includes several reliable sources. Cavarrone 22:51, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
keep per Cavarrone and also for same reasons/refs as the Zora comic above, they go hand in hand. —Noah 23:06, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:05, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:05, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.