Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacquie Jordan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 11:50, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jacquie Jordan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doubtful notability. Cannot find independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:GNG. Run-of-the-mill businesswoman. Promotional article. Edwardx (talk) 20:19, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Seems to be trying to sell consulting or speaking rather than be encyclopedic - PabloMartinez (talk) 20:24, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:53, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:53, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:34, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I removed the promotional wording and greatly improved the article. I believe she is notable for her work as a producer. She produced a season of Donny & Marie, which was nominated for two Emmy Awards. She also was a co-executive producer for the first three years of the talk show Sunday Morning Shootout and an executive producer of Square Off. WP:CREATIVE says a person may be notable if "The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work" (she's helped produce three major shows) and if the person's work "has won significant critical attention," which I think two Emmy nominations counts for. Lonehexagon (talk) 23:27, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:59, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep generally per Lonehexagon who has demonstrated sufficient WP:DEPTH and WP:PERSISTENT coverage to pass the notability requirements. —SerialNumber54129^{paranoia /cheap shit room} 15:46, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:42, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per lack of substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. FloridaArmy (talk) 21:59, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.