Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacqueline Storey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 00:33, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jacqueline Storey[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person does not appear to meet the basic requirements for inclusion. Whilst there are claims of notability, I cannot find any sources directly discussing the subject of the article and it is therefore not verifiable as required by WP:BLP. There is a related discussion at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Smartse (talk) 13:52, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Currently none of the three refs mention Storey, though one has a link to adjudicators where she is listed amongst dozens of other people. She does not seem to be notable based on the refs given. Malick78 (talk) 20:10, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:BIO and the references do not support notability. Johnuniq (talk) 03:41, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BIO Ealdgyth - Talk 14:06, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:BIO. Joaquin008 ^(talk) 18:01, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per the others, fails WP:BIO. ukexpat (talk) 20:30, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.