Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Rumbiak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. see comment from nom at the bottom - snow/nom withdrawn StarM 00:30, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob Rumbiak[edit]

delete one article doesn't warrant inclusion. need more sources Hell in a Bucket (talk) 21:12, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- I'^mperator 21:30, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Reading the newspaper article is enough to satisfy me of his notability, even though it is not flattering for the subject. Other sources will no doubt be found and a lack of cited sources is not a reason to delete, only a lack of available sources. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 21:50, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So one article makes you notable? Personally I don't buy that but to each his own. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 22:19, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, that is not what I said at all. Please refrain in the future from putting words in my mouth. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 23:24, 9 June 2009

(UTC)

Perhaps you'd like to clarify then....And I wasn't trying to put words in your mouth just reiterate my understanding. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 23:58, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, all you have to do to establish notability is a google search.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.39.35.50 (talk) 23:06, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep. The references that are now there and others that should be forthcoming are more than enough to establish notability and expand this article. --Bduke (Discussion) 23:54, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The article does have more sources added now. I wouldn't be averse to wrapping this afd up under WP:snow as well as the fact the article while poorly written is notable. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 00:09, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.