Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Lavoro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 01:58, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob Lavoro[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:BLP1E and WP:PERP. This person is only notable for being arrested for marijuana possession. A PROD was declined. power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:30, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete being arrested for marijuana possession is far, far, far too common to make someone notable. The particulars here still do not rise to the level of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:07, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 05:12, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 05:12, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete The notability claim here is being charged with a crime that could've lead to a life in prison jail sentence - on a relatively small amount - based on the amount of estimated finished brownie weight. With enough sourcing - this actually could be notable standalone, but in this case (mainly news coverage in 2014, a single book mention) - I don't see this rising to GNG. Content could be merged/redirected if there is an appropriate target.Icewhiz (talk) 06:40, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the subject committed a minor crime that does not have the coverage to need an encyclopedia article and a clear case of WP:BLP1E Atlantic306 (talk) 13:51, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Merge, plea deal ended the case with a far less draconian sentence. The pot brownie weight is fascinating, but more relevant to an article about cannibis laws in Texas. Definitely a BIO1E. This article content could be merged into Cannabis in Texas. Montanabw^(talk) 05:37, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.