Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Gelt Dekker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Michig (talk) 08:08, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob Gelt Dekker[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

does not pass GNG, the one possible claim to notability is unsourced Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:37, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 05:17, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 05:17, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:21, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - There appears to be substantial sourcing in Dutch. Page exists for this millionaire businessman, philanthropist, and museum operator on German WP. HERE is substantial coverage in the book Living History: Encountering the Memory of the Heirs of Slavery. 31.4K Google hits for the very unique name indicates a large iceberg of potential source material. Carrite (talk) 19:34, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

THIS is a link to his talk at the first Dutch TEDx. Carrite (talk) 19:41, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:16, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep just because one is too lazy to look beyond English speaking pages doesn't give one the right to declare "lack of notability". Gelt Dekker's main Wikipedia page is in Dutch [1] and has a number of Dutch language sources. I am adding in-line English and Dutch sources to the English article. As of 28 December article is now better sourced RSarlls
Delete- Not notable. There are lots of millionaire businessmen, if he was a billionaire then maybe. I am not convinced just because a Dutch wiki exists (maybe that should be deleted too?) and one mention in a book isn't notable. In the other sources (at least those I can read), he eithier just gets a passing mention or the sources or local.--Rusf10 (talk) 14:45, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:38, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There may be lot of millionaires but some can stand out of the rest and this one for sure is. And given his German nationality it is reasonable more sources about him must exist in German, which simple Google search in English cannot show. –Ammarpad (talk) 05:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I wholeheartedly agree with User: RSarlls who said: "Keep just because one is too lazy to look beyond English speaking pages doesn't give one the right to declare "lack of notability". A quick review of his business career and other achievements show he is notable.Knox490 (talk) 06:15, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- squeaks by on WP:GNG per review of available sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:40, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.