Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson Sweeney

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as non-notable per WP:MUSICBIO and general notability guidelines. JamieS93 ^{be kind to newcomers} 00:52, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jackson Sweeney[edit]

Article was PRODed as "Fails WP:MUSICBIO; only claim to notability is having won a non-notable award." An IP changed the rationale to read "SUCCEEDS WP:MUSICBIO; 'Has become the most prominent representative of a notable style or of the local scene of a city'" which I am counting as a contestation of the PROD.

My own search found very little info about the subject, and I agree that the award is not sufficient to establish notability. As such, I am recommending deletion. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:58, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The youth orchestra and the subjects involvement may lead to notability in the future. To date, the body of work does not appear to have sufficient importance. Stormbay (talk) 01:24, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- (X! · talk) · @925 · 21:12, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 04:43, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:44, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable musician; fails WP:MUSIC and WP:BIO. I was unable to find relevant sources for this individual through a Google News Archive search. Cunard (talk) 01:26, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.