Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson Odell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:04, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jackson Odell

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: insufficiently notable as actor; tragedy of his death at such an early age does not confer notability, per se. Quis separabit? 22:31, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Every morning (there's a halo...) 22:45, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Every morning (there's a halo...) 22:45, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:02, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:02, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:02, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Did not meet WP:GNG when he was alive, and does not become notable just by dying so young. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:24, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unfortunately as his most significant role only appeared in 8 out of 101 series episodes of The Goldbergs, so does not pass WP:NACTOR, the coverage is WP:BLP1E, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 19:53, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Whenever debates like this arise I always see them be kept because the subject received enough international attention from the reporting about their death. I don’t necessarily agree with it but if others have been kept for that reason we should at least keep consistent in its enforcement. So I vote keep. Rusted AutoParts 04:22, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If the only thing the subject is notable for is their death, then it falls under WP:BLP1E. Ifnord (talk) 12:55, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.