Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackie Geist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 23:36, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jackie Geist[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While her being Miss California might be seen as one event, it is not even that high from what I have found. The article has 0 reliable sources. The sources are all either produced by Miss America or Miss California, and thus PR promotion, or sources such as IMDb which is not considered reliable. There might have been some news coverage of her winning Miss California, but I did not find it in my search. I did learn that she now has the married last name of Frank. That was from the Miss California information page. John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:45, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The google news search did pull up a few mentions at the time of the contest, but none of them are even about Geist herself. One is an article about the rise in the amount of muscles on Miss America contestants and others equally do not cover Geist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:49, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 October 21. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:21, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:21, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- an under-sourced BLP with no other achievements listed. Per WP:OUTCOMES, these pages are routinely deleted. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:59, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, generally the sourcing for these beauty pageant contestants is quite thin due to little interest from outside the pageant industry, and this BLP is no exception. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:31, 29 October 2016 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.