Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Wallington

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 04:40, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Wallington[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

typical PR bio for midlevel executive: promotional aspects include: putting current position first, giving a list of what he supports but without evidence he has done anything particular about them, using his name as often as possible, listing minor awards.

There is furthermore no actual proof of notability except for misc. press releasees, listings, and his own publications.

I tried rewriting this to remove promotionalism , but I found there was nothing left. DGG ( talk ) 04:05, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Reads more like a promotional bio than an objective Wikipedia entry.TH1980 (talk) 04:18, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator. AD ^Talk 04:39, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Daily Mail as a source goes without saying. Trillfendi (talk) 04:44, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:50, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:50, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:50, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete claims are highly exaggerated. For example, "starred" in a BBC series, but the series was a home gardening show where the show visits a different home gardener every week, and one week they came to his garden. None of the several similar claims in article are claims to anything recognized here as notability. and there is no WP:SIGCOV of him.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:01, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.