Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Shook

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:55, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Shook[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Jack Shook (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Probably was a good guy but unfortunately I can’t seem to find any evidence of true notability as he as a person/sole individual does not seem to have in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources as such doesn’t scale WP:GNG. Celestina007 (talk) 14:36, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:36, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:36, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:36, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:36, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:36, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:36, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep multiple sources are listed in the article which shows a pass of WP:GNG. True, most of the sources are offline but I see no reason to not WP:AGF. Plus, he's a member of the country music hall of fame which shows national recognition.--Paul McDonald (talk) 20:22, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • KeepI'm a new editor and not sure I should be voting, but I was really surprised to see this up for deletion. I wrote teh article and I didn't add all the sources that I found at one time because I was assuming since Wikipedia is a community effort that others would come and get involved. Can't imagine he isn't wiki worthy with sources like this that describe him as "part of teh Nashville initial cadre of studio professionals who helped to create the city's recording industry." Losing you to find me (talk) 07:41, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's ok (and good!) to vote on articles that you've written. It's a nice article; thank you for writing it. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 19:58, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep this old-timer.NotButtigieg (talk) 18:47, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep this article--absolutely!--per Paul McDonald. Should not have been nominated for deletion. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 19:56, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as has multiple reliable sources coverage and is a member of a significant hall of fame, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:00, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • comment I don't find him listed as a member at the Country Music Hall of Fame[1]. If he is a member then he's certainly notable.Sandals1 (talk) 19:38, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Good catch. Looks like that's an entry in their database, not a member listing. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 20:00, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jack_Shook&oldid=935600772"